How labour started
Of the 285,305 women who gave birth in Australia in 2023, here is how their labours started. These are national averages across all hospitals, both public and private.
Spontaneous labour40%
Induced labour33%
No labour (pre-labour caesarean)27%
40% of women went into labour on their own. 33% had labour started artificially (induction). 27% had a planned caesarean before labour began.
Source: AIHW Australia's Mothers and Babies 2023 · aihw.gov.au/reports/mothers-babies/australias-mothers-babies
Where women give birth
Of the 285,305 women who gave birth in Australia in 2023, here is where they had their babies.
Public hospital75%
Private hospital25%
Birth centre1.5%
Home0.7% (2,081 births)
The average age of Australian mothers is now 31.3 years, up from 28.9 in 1998. For first-time mothers it is 29.9, up from 28.3 in 2010. Planned homebirth numbers have more than doubled in four years, from 923 in 2019 to 2,081 in 2023.
Source: AIHW Australia's Mothers and Babies 2023 · aihw.gov.au/reports/mothers-babies/australias-mothers-babies
Trends over time (2004-2023)
How national birth statistics have changed over two decades. All figures are percentages of total Australian births in that year, unless stated otherwise.
| Metric | 2004 | 2010 | 2023 |
|---|
| Caesarean rate | 29% | 32% | 41% |
| Spontaneous labour | - | 56% | 40% |
| Induction rate | - | ~27% | 33% |
| Homebirth (total) | - | - | 2,081 |
| vs 2019 | - | - | 923 (2019) |
| Average maternal age | - | 30.1 | 31.3 |
| Smoking in pregnancy | - | ~13% (2011) | 7.8% |
The most striking trend is the steady rise in caesarean births (29% to 41% of all births) and the corresponding decline in spontaneous labour (56% to 40%). Planned homebirth has more than doubled but still accounts for fewer than 1% of all births. Smoking during pregnancy has nearly halved.
Source: AIHW Australia's Mothers and Babies 2023 · aihw.gov.au/reports/mothers-babies/australias-mothers-babies; AIHW National Perinatal Data Collection time series
Maternal and baby outcomes
National averages for mothers and babies in Australia (2023), across all birth settings.
Maternal health (national, 2023)
| Maternal mortality | 8.2 per 100,000 (2023; triennium 2021-2023: 6.7 per 100,000) |
| Breastfeeding initiation | 91-96% |
| Exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months | 38% |
| Perinatal mental health | 1 in 5 mothers, 1 in 10 fathers |
Baby outcomes (national, 2023)
| Stillbirth rate | 8.7 per 1,000 (2023; AIHW reports this as the highest rate in over 20 years and a continuation of recent increases) |
| Neonatal death rate | 2.4 per 1,000 |
| Preterm birth (<37 weeks) | 8.4% |
| Low birth weight (<2,500g) | 6.6% |
| Admitted to NICU/SCN | 18% |
| Apgar score ≥7 at 5 minutes | 98% |
Maternal mortality means the number of mothers who die during pregnancy or within 42 days of birth, per 100,000 births. Australia's rate of 8.2 is low globally but has not improved in recent years. Breastfeeding initiation is high (91-96% start breastfeeding), but only 38% are still exclusively breastfeeding at six months. One in five mothers experiences a perinatal mental health condition such as anxiety or depression.
Source: AIHW Australia's Mothers and Babies 2023 · aihw.gov.au/reports/mothers-babies/australias-mothers-babies; AIHW Perinatal Deaths 2023; PANDA 2024
Outcomes by care model
How outcomes differ depending on the model of maternity care. These comparisons are for low-risk women to make the comparison fair.
MGP (midwifery group practice) vs standard hospital care
MGP means you see the same midwife or small team throughout pregnancy, birth, and after. "Standard care" means you see whichever midwife or doctor is rostered on. This comparison is for first-time mothers at low risk of complications.
Unassisted vaginal birth (first-time mothers) Source: Cochrane Review, Sandall et al. 2024, doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub6; AIHW Maternity Models of Care 2025 (aihw.gov.au)
Private midwifery vs national average
Private midwifery means hiring your own midwife who provides one-on-one continuity. These figures compare first-time mothers at Australia’s largest private midwifery service (2,747 women, 2014 to 2022) with national indicators for first-time mothers. Worth keeping in mind: women who choose a private midwife tend to start out lower risk, and the study was not adjusted for that, so some of the gap reflects who chooses the model rather than the model itself.
Induction of labourPrivate midwifery22.9%
National average45.8%
CaesareanPrivate midwifery22.6%
National average32.1%
Instrumental vaginal birthPrivate midwifery17.0%
National average25.7%
EpisiotomyPrivate midwifery9.5%
National average23.9%
Source: Gao, Wilkes et al., Women and Birth, 2024 (retrospective cohort study) PMID 38402093
All five models, side by side
Most comparisons put midwifery care against everything else pooled together, or private hospitals against public. Neither tells you how the models themselves compare. This one does, and it is the only Australian study that places privately practising midwives alongside the rest rather than against a national average.
| Outcome | Standard public | GP shared | Midwifery continuity | Private obstetric | Private midwife |
|---|
| Labour started on its own | 45.5% | 54.3% | 63.6% | 32.0% | 91.2% |
| Induction of labour | 38.8% | 33.6% | 28.3% | 35.2% | 6.4% |
| Vaginal birth (no forceps or vacuum) | 49.9% | 49.9% | 67.8% | 39.0% | 81.1% |
| Instrumental birth | 12.8% | 16.9% | 11.2% | 10.8% | 9.2% |
| Caesarean during labour | 19.6% | 19.3% | 12.4% | 16.1% | 7.8% |
| Planned caesarean | 17.7% | 13.9% | 8.7% | 34.1% | 1.9% |
Two things here matter more than the headline. Once the figures are adjusted, induction under private obstetric care is not meaningfully different from standard public care: the private difference sits almost entirely in planned caesarean. And no model differs significantly on instrumental birth at all.
How to read it. This shows what women who chose each model experienced, not what each model causes. Women who choose a private midwife differ from women who choose a private obstetrician in ways no adjustment fully removes. The survey was self-reported, those who took part self-selected and skew older and more advantaged, it covers 2020 and 2021, and only 192 of the women had a private midwife. Epidural was not measured.
Source: Dahlen HG et al., Women and Birth 2026;39:102178 (BITTOC national survey, n=3,682)
Planned homebirth with a registered midwife
Large studies from the UK and Australia found that for low-risk women, planned homebirth with a qualified midwife was associated with lower rates of perineal trauma (tearing) and postpartum haemorrhage, and higher rates of vaginal birth compared to hospital-based care. Individual circumstances and access to emergency transfer are important considerations.
Source: Birthplace in England 2011, BMJ 2011;343:d7400, PMID 22117057; Catling-Paull et al. 2013; Homer et al. 2019